HEALTH PROGRAM EVALUATION (Impact Evaluation and Accountability CASE Research Paper

HEALTH PROGRAM EVALUATION (Impact Evaluation and Accountability CASE 4) - Research Paper Example GAO supports the senate in curbing errors of federal processes in healthcare through reporting on the progress of health standards. Furthermore, it enhances performance analysis in policies and drawing choices for senate objectives, auditing operations of the organization to conclude whether state funds are subject to appropriate organization. Indeed, it equally looks into improper and unlawful allegations and issues legitimate verdicts like information about agency rules. Most of GAO’s responsibilities in the State healthcare programs base on organizational planning objective one, which is offering well timed and excellence services to U.S senate. It also ensures that the State government handles current issues for their well-being and financial safety of American people. For example, FY2007, GAO delivered information which helped in coming up with ways of solving problems that were disabling the provision of services to the injured veterans and soldiers (Dodaro, 2010). The organizations well-known products comprises of lawful choices and views, reports, special publications and testimonies. In addition, the GAO suggests solutions to problems that evident in government programs; they detect long-term developments and raise concerns on the fiscal status of the state. Among its latest distinctive report is the 21st period challenge, which was about reexamining Federal government base. The report’s aim was to assist the U.S in the review and deliberation of State spending and tax programs in healthcare spending. GAO also analyses and monitors the changes involved in lasting fiscal outlook, consequences of healthcare and demographic costs and other fiscal commitments in the state (Dodaro, 2010). Evaluation process exudes various challenges. Apart from timeliness, quality and relevance that evaluation entails, the main challenge is in conveying of evaluation outcomes to audiences participating in